The Inherent Structural Vulnerabilities of Italian Cars (Wiper Malfunction, Alfa 147 Selespeed)

Shortly after the rainy season began, I received a call from an Alfa 147 late-model owner reporting that the driver’s side wiper was wobbling and behaving erratically.

I advised them to bring the car in when the weather improved and proceeded to research wiper linkage issues online.

Vehicle details: 2006 GH-937AB Twin Spark 2.0L Selespeed, mileage: 72,000 km

It appears to be a common issue, with part of the linkage prone to breakage.

Not limited to Alfa Romeo, many foreign cars use plastic parts in structurally critical areas. This case is no exception, with plastic components used in key areas supporting wiper movement.
The part’s location under the cowl top garnish’s mesh section likely accelerated deterioration due to prolonged sun exposure.

Under the garnish lies a mechanism that converts the motor’s rotational motion into reciprocating motion.

The broken part is near the pivot point, constantly subjected to the strong spring force of the wiper arm.

In the past, I actively worked on foreign cars to experience different cultures. However, when faced with unreasonable and inexplicable vulnerabilities rarely seen in Japanese cars, it often made the entire vehicle feel cheap. The flowing body lines and brilliant colors would suddenly lose their appeal, leaving me disheartened.

[Reference] Honda Freed’s wiper linkage. The wiper arm attachment point appears appropriately strong and naturally shaped.

At 18 years old, new wiper linkage parts for this 147 are no longer available. Unreliable used parts are being traded at high prices. While expensive aftermarket new parts exist, their cost seems disproportionate and not worth ordering.

Research revealed that early 147 models and early GT models shared a common wiper linkage part (RHD P/N 46751713). Later models were assigned separate part numbers (147 late model RHD P/N 50501304, GT late model RHD P/N 50502817).

The wiper arms for late-model 147 and GT are identical. Comparing photos of used parts, I couldn’t discern any difference between the late 147 and late GT linkages.
While late 147 used parts have inflated prices, late GT parts are relatively newer and more reasonably priced.

Hoping to use the GT part as a substitute, I scoured domestic and international forums but couldn’t find a definitive answer about the differences or compatibility between 50501304 and 50502817.

Deciding it was worth the risk, I ordered a used late GT 50502817 part.

Upon comparing the actual parts, I finally discovered that the length of the driver’s side wiper arm attachment differed significantly.

Fortunately, using tools like a wiper arm puller, I was able to swap components. I carefully transferred the driver’s side crank from the 50501304 to the 50502817.

The motor shaft’s ball joint could also be detached and reattached without damage if done carefully and evenly.

The swap was successfully completed.

(Having trouble with video playback? Click here)